Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orzhov Pixie | piotr szyiński | 9-5 | None |
| Azorius Omniscience | takano kantaro | 8-4 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Omniscience , Boros Burn , Jeskai Control , Mardu Mobilize , Mono White Ugin , Mono-Red Aggro , Orzhov Control , Orzhov Pixie , Selesnya Cage
Meta Performance Analysis
Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd ranks #1188 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 23%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 47.0%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 7.56 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd has a win rate of 62.4%, making it 31.3% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flickerwisp | Creature — Elemental | 5 | 69.5% | 1 |
| Boggart Trawler | Creature — Goblin | 6 | 69.0% | 1 |
| Emperor of Bones | Creature — Skeleton Noble | 6 | 69.0% | 1 |
| Overlord of the Balemurk | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 6 | 69.0% | 1 |
| Recruiter of the Guard | Creature — Human Soldier | 13 | 67.5% | 4 |
| Aether Vial | Artifact | 8 | 67.4% | 2 |
| Orcish Bowmasters | Creature — Orc Archer | 5 | 65.0% | 1 |
| Stifle | Instant | 5 | 65.0% | 1 |
| Sanctifier en-Vec | Creature — Human Cleric | 8 | 62.0% | 1 |
| Prismatic Ending | Sorcery | 14 | 60.6% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatile Stormdrake | Creature — Drake | 2 | 7 | 85.7% | 62.9% | +22.8% |
| Recruiter of the Guard | Creature — Human Soldier | 3 | 11 | 78.0% | 60.8% | +17.2% |
| Aether Vial | Artifact | 1 | 7 | 72.0% | 57.4% | +14.6% |
| Overlord of the Balemurk | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 5 | 75.0% | 61.5% | +13.5% |
| Reflector Mage | Creature — Human Wizard | 3 | 7 | 73.9% | 60.5% | +13.4% |
| Broadside Bombardiers | Creature — Goblin Pirate | 3 | 10 | 72.2% | 58.9% | +13.3% |
| Boggart Trawler | Creature — Goblin | 3 | 5 | 75.0% | 62.8% | +12.2% |
| Wrath of the Skies | Sorcery | 2 | 9 | 76.0% | 64.5% | +11.5% |
| Force of Will | Instant | 5 | 15 | 69.5% | 59.2% | +10.3% |
| Stony Silence | Enchantment | 2 | 9 | 68.2% | 58.0% | +10.2% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Control | 22 | 6.3% | 55.7% |
| Orzhov Pixie | 5 | 2.0% | 69.5% |
| Boros Burn | 4 | 0.9% | 50.0% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 3 | 0.5% | 51.4% |
| Mono-Red Aggro | 2 | 0.5% | 0.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.